Free Capital Punishment Essay - Criminals Need the Death Penalty :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Essays - Criminals Need the Death Penalty Is the death penalty just? Politicians, lobbyists, philosophers, and experts from all walks of life continuously debate this controversial subject. Has any one of these individuals listened to the rest of us? The answer in many cases is no. The United States is a democracy of embodied officials, who represent the people, their wishes, beliefs and ideals. That means, through elections, we decide what policies are to be enacted. In the case of capital punishment, various polls report that seventy percent of Americans are in favor of the death sentence. That is a clear majority. So called experts are free to petition grievances and speak freely according to our constitution. But the fact of the matter is seven out of ten Americans have evaluated the dilemma of capital punishment according to their own values and beliefs. Their conclusion was favorable to the death penalty. At this juncture of time, the question of it being just was answered by the majority - and the majority rules. Many experts who speak against the death penalty cite it as barbaric. The definition of murder, according to Webster, is "the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought." Therefore an uneducated person would classify murder as equally barbaric. The mitigating factor of the death penalty is, or should be, an already established punishment for this crime. The killer willingly committed the heinous act of taking a life, knowing they would be subject to this penalty. Therefore, he decided to gamble on not being caught, or thought that he was above the law. In either case he willingly forfeited his life with the taking of another. The killer may not agree with "Lex Taliones", but the consequence of his action were obvious. While critics argue that an innocent person may be put to death, most agree this may unfortunately happen. However, we must protect the people of this country from killers, and unfortunately, short of calling in the army, we have tried all other options. Capital statutes usually allow the trial court to impose death only after a postconviction hearing, during which circumstances of the crime are reviewed. If the "aggravating" factors prevail, the case is automatically reviewed by an appellate court. The accused may also appeal the decision or request a stay of execution as he sees fit. Although the risk of an accidental death is there, the legal proceedings are in place to prevent an unwarranted death. An argument put forth by many is that the economics involved with capital punishment is irrelevant.

Jenkins Corporation True of False Test

1) An example of a goal statement that is SMART is â€Å"Jenkins Corporation expects to achieve a 5% improvement in the on-time delivery of its computer components. True / False2) You are involved with a team where members encourage relationship-building roles and team members take responsibility for providing feedback regarding performance. Your team is in the norming stage. True / False3) Open ended questions elicit specific information are useful for point clarification and when time is limited. However, they questions restrict the interviewee’s freedom. True / False4) When presenting to a group that may display opposition to the topic, it is advisable to tailor your message utilizing a two-sided message. True / False5) Double-barreled questions assume a condition that the interviewee may not agree with but calls for the interviewee to support that condition. True / False6) When planning a meeting that applies the rule of three-fourths, information is dispersed to particip ants at the three-quarter point between meetings. True / False7) The task of the team in the forming stage is to clarify direction. True / False8) An Everest goal represents an extraordinary achievement. True / False9) Abilene paradox and boiled frog syndrome enhance the effectiveness of decision making in team meetings. True / False10) To reach the fourth stage of the four stages of team development labeled by Tuckman, a team must progress through the first three stages of development. True / False11) Once the team has developed a comfortable climate, the next stage is the performing stage. True / False12) â€Å"You are completely naive,† is more effective feedback than â€Å"Your comments are not on the topic.† True / False13) When conducting an interview, elaboration, clarification, and repetition may be used as probing methods. True / False14) When planning a meeting that applies the rule of halves, agenda items are in the hands of the agenda  scheduler no later than one-half of the time interval between the last meeting and the upcoming meeting. True / False

Heraclitus on Flux and Logos - 889 Words

A man named Heraclitus from Ephesus was a philosopher who created groundbreaking views of philosophy. He wrote a book and also was known to write in riddles; this is where he got the name â€Å"Heraclitus the obscure.† Along with books and riddles, his preference of style was the epigram. This is where he put a lot of information and put it all into one short sentence. He was born into a wealthy family. He was involved heavily in politics and religion. He later decided to move out and live in the mountains. This is where he would become close to nature and realize how the world is in a constant change. Heraclitus would go on to impact many famous philosophers after his time, the famous Plato and Aristotle being some of these. Heraclitus created views of flux and opposition and also his use of the term â€Å"logos.† Flux is a continuous change. Heraclitus introduces his view of metaphysics by introducing, â€Å"flux,† by the use of a river. â€Å"Heraclitus, I be lieve, says that all things pass and nothing stays, and comparing existing things to the flow of a river, he says you could not step twice into the same river,† (Graham, Heraclitus). This was a statement given from Plato to try and understand Heraclitus’ view of flux. What he means by this quote, is that â€Å"you cannot simply step in the same river,† (Melchert, The Great Conversation A Historical Introduction To Philosophy). He then goes on to say that one can and cannot step in the same river. What Heraclitus means by this is that evenShow MoreRelatedThe Idea Of Unity1061 Words   |  5 PagesHeraclitus philosophized the idea of unity. Concepts such as logs, fire and opposites are one; the relations to all three is what this paper will clarify. Logos then is the concept of universal, as all things being one. These things, or rather elements such as fire exhibit a constant change governed by reality. Opposites comes into play as being a system of balance and e xchange between reality. It is then understood that Heraclitus understood realty as an ongoing existence between all things andRead MoreAristotle s Views On Metaphysics And Cosmology1481 Words   |  6 Pagesthe position of a monist, offers arguments through his poem that are not so clearly of monist persuasion and at times, creates a whole host of possible meanings. His views on metaphysics and cosmology seem to differ from his predecessor Heraclitus’ doctrine of flux, believing instead that all is continuously one and unchanging, maintaining that beings are what exist and non-beings cannot exist through the acknowledgement that what is existent cannot be created into existence or have existence takenRead MoreThe Epic Of Gilgamesh 1523 Words   |  7 Pagesand Reich 236). Pythagoreanism: This philosophy is related to Pythagoras from Samos (582-496 BCE) and introduced the doctrine of harmony. Ephesians School: Heraclitus from Ephesus of Anatolia (present day Turkey) developed the philosophy of perpetual flux which argued that all things are in form of logical pattern (logos). For instance, Heraclitus believed that all things originated from fire and will return to fire. Atomist School: The atomist school philosophy was inspired by Leucippus and his pupilRead MoreTheaetetus : An Analysis Of Platos Definitions Of Knowledge2057 Words   |  9 Pagessame as perception. And as a result, things are for the individual such as he perceives it. Socrates goes ahead to state that this Protagorean principle may also contain a reference to another tenet, a doctrine that comes from Heraclitus who said that â€Å"all things are in flux.† Socrates first introduces the Heracleitean theory in (152d) by stating â€Å"... What is really true is this: the things of which we naturally say that they ‘are’, are in the process of coming to be, as the result of movement and